On 08/17/2012 04:15 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 08/17/2012 04:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Aug 17, 2012, at 17:05, [email protected] wrote:
Revision: 96718
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/96718
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2012-08-17 15:05:18 -0700 (Fri, 17 Aug 2012)
Log Message:
-----------
python-1.0.tcl: rename Python 2.{4,5} files in ${prefix}/bin.
This fixes an inconsistently between ports that work with Python
2.{6,7} where the binary is installed in ${prefix}/Library/Frameworks
and ports that work with Python 2.{4,5} where the binary is installed
into ${prefix}/bin. With this change, by default, all files installed
in ${prefix}/bin end in -${python.branch} so the port doesn't have to
handle different Python versions.
Doesn't this change where all ports that use the python portgroup (and
have 24 or 25 branches) install their files? Don't all those ports
therefore need a revbump? Also several ports had been manually adding
suffixes; those manual changes will need to be removed from those
ports as well.
Yes, I need to go through these myself. Some other authors have already
been picking up on this change.
I wonder if I should bump the revision number even if it may not need
it, to catch any issues, instead of have them slowly trickle in later
when failed builds.
Blair
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
