On 2012-8-24 00:32 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote: >> There may actually be a license compliance issue here since the license >> changed to GPL. We have to either make the source available along with >> the binaries, or include a written offer to give the source to anyone >> who asks for it (or pass on someone else's such written offer). Being >> able to get the source from a third party (i.e. github) doesn't cut it. > > Good catch; shall we just drop it due to being inconsistent with its own > license?
Well, I think it's either that or use a github-generated source tarball from the appropriate commit. (It's not inherently breaking its own license BTW; the copyright holder doesn't need a license and can distribute binaries to whoever he likes. As it stands, it's just impossible for anyone else to legally redistribute those binaries...) - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
