On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> And are we in agreement that linking with a library is a good reason not to 
> omit the dependency? And that therefore we should go back and add the libpng 
> dependency to every port that links with it? Because at the moment that is 
> what I plan to do as I go through and fix various libpng 1.5 breakages. I'm 
> conflicted about adding the dependency, but it seems the best solution we 
> have at this time, given that we do not yet have the ideal automated solution 
> you alluded to below:

I do agree in such a case.

-- 
Andrea
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to