On Oct 13, 2012, at 02:42, [email protected] wrote: > Revision: 98693 > http://trac.macports.org//changeset/98693 > Author: [email protected] > Date: 2012-10-13 00:42:05 -0700 (Sat, 13 Oct 2012) > Log Message: > ----------- > kde4-kile: passing tex dependencies to binary instead of ports > > Modified Paths: > -------------- > trunk/dports/tex/kde4-kile/Portfile > > Modified: trunk/dports/tex/kde4-kile/Portfile > =================================================================== > --- trunk/dports/tex/kde4-kile/Portfile 2012-10-13 05:00:05 UTC (rev > 98692) > +++ trunk/dports/tex/kde4-kile/Portfile 2012-10-13 07:42:05 UTC (rev > 98693) > @@ -30,10 +30,9 @@ > > depends_run-append port:okular \ > port:kate \ > - port:ImageMagick \ > - port:ghostscript \ > - port:texlive-basic \ > - port:texlive-latex > + bin:convert:ImageMagick \ > + bin:gs:ghostscript \ > + bin:tex:texlive
Why do we want to allow non-MacPorts versions of ImageMagick or Ghostscript to be used? That seems contrary to our policy: https://trac.macports.org/wiki/FAQ#ownlibs I understand the TeX change, since we make an exception to the rule for TeX. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
