On Oct 26, 2012, at 14:03, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> But it looks like a download for version "0.1a" was posted recently. Maybe > that could be used. No, I guess not... it's a pre-compiled binary, not source. And 0.1a was released 2012-10-10, which corresponded to the port's previous version "58977169". So we could either say we don't care and call this new version of the port "0.1a" anyway, on the basis that it's just a one-line addition. That's what I'm going to propose in: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/36745 _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
