On Oct 26, 2012, at 14:03, Frank Schima <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2012, at 12:44 PM, vincent habchi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 26 oct. 2012, at 20:28, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> My initial reaction is to wait until boost 1.52 is out, since the port >>> presumably works ok right now with other compilers. >> >> Cgal 4.0.(2) port forces the compiler to be llvm-gcc. If that could be >> avoided… > > Unfortunately the current cgal port does not work right now because it should > be built with gcc. It builds but causes crashes. But I agree we should wait > until it works with BOOST, because replacing it with another broken version > does not make much sense. Oh, I didn't understand that the current port does not work. If that's so, and the new port does work (except for the optional demos variant), then absolutely update it. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
