On Oct 31, 2012, at 4:35 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On Oct 31, 2012, at 9:31 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> that vercmp thinks is newer but is actually older), we ask the port author >> to increase the epoch. > Which is very unwanted on the other hand, since it is so sticky, i.e. will > have to be increased forever once it has been added to a port file, right?! > So, it's best to find a way around epoch!
?? why would anyone care? The whole point of epoch is to be able to deal with situations like this, I don't see why anyone would want to go to extra effort to avoid using it. -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
