On 11/1/12 7:50 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Nov 1, 2012, at 21:41, Blair Zajac wrote:
Yes, but we still like to do 'svn copy' to retain history.
Sure, for files that have a history. But in the past, if I needed to, say, add
a patch to both graphviz and graphviz-devel, I would have added it to one,
committed it, updated, then copied it to the other and committed. Now I don't
feel bad about committing both together as unrelated adds.
You're referring to adding a patch in files/? Yeah, I don't think that level of
history tracking is important, most important is copying entire port directories.
Blair
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
