On 27 déc. 2012, at 10:49, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:

> later some portion of it would be found to be unusable in some way. Working 
> copies are commonly considered to be disposable, so while the developers of 
> Subversion of course tried to fix these bugs in later versions of Subversion, 
> the answer to the user was always to delete the working copy and check out a 
> new one.

Well, I guess I could do that of course. I don’t see any stale directory in my 
tree, so t would be the best move onwards.

> Not sure exactly what you mean by "repertories".

Sorry Ryan. Sometimes I end up mixing French and English words. It’s hard to 
keep a perfect waterproof barrier between the two, sometimes it leaks. I meant 
‘directories’; French word would be ‘répertoire’, so ‘repertories’ is a nice 
chimera! ;)

Cheers!
Vincent
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to