On 01/08/2013 04:26 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jan 8, 2013, at 17:03, Frank Schima wrote:
On Jan 8, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
Is fixing a broken man page (or broken documentation, in general) worth a rev
bump? The current zsh has a broken zshall(1).
Yes. Anytime the installed files change or a dependency changes but the version
does not, the port should get a revision increase.
I agree. But sometimes there are complaints about rebuilds being requested for
small updates like this. To make the update more substantial, try to combine
this change with something else if possible, like a version update or fixing
some outstanding bug in the port. If there aren't any other changes that could
be made now, then go ahead and commit just this fix with the revbump; better to
fix the bug than not to.
Isn't that a less of a problem with our binary packages?
Blair
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
