On Jan 11, 2013, at 02:43, Nicolas Pavillon wrote: >> Is it really a typo? Q_WS_MACX used to be a valid thing. Is it not anymore? > > Is it ? I always encountered Q_WS_MAC and it was the first time I saw > Q_WS_MACX.
I just know that there are thousands of results for Q_WS_MACX on Google, dating back to the Qt 3 days. I see it's still defined in Qt 4.8.4 in /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/QtCore.framework/Versions/4/Headers/qglobal.h along with Q_WS_MAC. Unfortunately since Qt's latest web site reorganization it appears to be impossible to find anything in their documentation so I have no idea what the intended difference is between these defines. But at least in qglobal.h today there isn't any difference in how or when they're defined. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
