On Tuesday, January 15, 2013, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

>
> On Jan 15, 2013, at 08:51, ebori...@macports.org <javascript:;> wrote:
>
> > Revision: 101627
> >          https://trac.macports.org/changeset/101627
> > Author:   ebori...@macports.org <javascript:;>
> > Date:     2013-01-15 06:51:39 -0800 (Tue, 15 Jan 2013)
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > py-spyder-devel: Update to 2.2.0beta
> >
> > Modified Paths:
> > --------------
> >    trunk/dports/python/py-spyder-devel/Portfile
> >
> > Modified: trunk/dports/python/py-spyder-devel/Portfile
> > ===================================================================
> > --- trunk/dports/python/py-spyder-devel/Portfile      2013-01-15
> 12:32:40 UTC (rev 101626)
> > +++ trunk/dports/python/py-spyder-devel/Portfile      2013-01-15
> 14:51:39 UTC (rev 101627)
> > @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@
> >
> > PortSystem          1.0
> > name                py-spyder-devel
> > -version             2.2.0-dev
> > +version             2.2.0beta1
> > revision            0
> > +epoch               20130115
>
> It can't be changed for py-spyder-devel now, but for other ports in the
> future, please just increase the epoch by one when it's needed. There's no
> reason for the epoch to be formatted to look like a date, and doing so will
> just be confusing years down the road.
>
> http://guide.macports.org/chunked/reference.html#reference.keywords
>

Ok. I kind like the date formatted ones (has more information encoded in it
than '1') and they seem to meet the "only requirements" from the guide. But
if minimal bumps are desired, so be it.

Thanks,
  Eric


-- 
Eric A. Borisch
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to