On Jan 31, 2013, at 21:17, [email protected] wrote:

> Revision: 102361
>          https://trac.macports.org/changeset/102361
> Author:   [email protected]
> Date:     2013-01-31 19:17:03 -0800 (Thu, 31 Jan 2013)
> Log Message:
> -----------
> elinks-devel: Update to 0.12pre6; blacklist llvm-gcc-4.2.
> 
> Modified Paths:
> --------------
>    trunk/dports/www/elinks-devel/Portfile
> 
> Modified: trunk/dports/www/elinks-devel/Portfile
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/dports/www/elinks-devel/Portfile    2013-02-01 03:14:01 UTC (rev 
> 102360)
> +++ trunk/dports/www/elinks-devel/Portfile    2013-02-01 03:17:03 UTC (rev 
> 102361)
> @@ -5,8 +5,7 @@
> 
> name                elinks-devel
> conflicts           elinks
> -version             0.12pre5
> -revision            1
> +version             0.12pre6
> categories          www
> maintainers         nomaintainer
> platforms           darwin
> @@ -30,7 +29,8 @@
> 
> distname            elinks-${version}
> master_sites        ${homepage}download/
> -checksums           rmd160 517f8ef0e1978a204496631a63495656fbf51f19
> +checksums           rmd160  68703f9fa8862c243a8083833d8447d4e09280ff \
> +                    sha256  
> c0b3a7871f4aea954b0a66d5bbc6ce6de55ad17aa25aba3987f775707067c800
> 
> patchfiles          patch-Makefile.lib.diff \
>                     patch-configure.diff
> @@ -88,9 +88,7 @@
>     build.cmd               ${prefix}/bin/gmake
> }
> 
> -if {${configure.compiler} == "llvm-gcc-4.2"} {
> -   configure.compiler       clang
> -}
> +compiler.blacklist          llvm-gcc-4.2

Does anybody know why llvm-gcc-4.2 is blacklisted?

I tried building elinks-devel 0.12pre5 and 0.12pre6 with llvm-gcc-4.2 on Lion 
with Xcode 4.3.3 and also on Snow Leopard with Xcode 3.2.6, and the builds 
succeeded.

The blacklisting was originally added in r81032 "to allow building on 10.7".

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to