On Mar 11, 2013, at 4:35 AM, "Andrea D'Amore" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have had the portfile partially edited for a while so I'm not sure
> about why I went with lib: in first place, IIRC it was to due the
> presence of multiple library version in ports rather than using a
> non-mp provided library, i.e. there's hdf5 and hdf5-18 and I didn't
> want to force one or the other.
> This could (and maybe should) be in portfile logic accessing registry,
> probably when I set the dependency I couldn't remember the registry
> functions and was too lazy to check those.
>
> So if there's an actual reason for switching this from lib: to port:
> dependency and putting in explicit logic for the dependency checking
> I'd like to read it. Otherwise I'd rather keep the port the way it is,
> possibly switching to path: dependencies with leading $prefix in order
> to keep them in ports.
If they use the same library name, you should be able to do something like
this. (I'm just making the path up; I don't know what the right one would be in
your case.)
path:lib/libhdf5.dylib:hdf5-18
This stays inside the MacPorts prefix.
vq
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
