Daniel Ericsson writes: > On 26 mar 2013, at 22:20, Sean Farley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Daniel Ericsson writes: >> >>> On 25 mar 2013, at 22:08, Sean Farley wrote: >>> >>>> I have a project that depends on the newer one located at launchpad but >>>> the versioning confuses me. The one at sourceforge hasn't been updated >>>> for at least four years while the one at launchpad seems more or less >>>> actively developed. >>> >>> It says on Sourceforge that 1.1.0 was posted 2013-03-11, 0.9.6-2 on >>> Ubuntu's launchpad was posted 2012-10-18? Sourceforge seems like the >>> canonical(ha!) source. >> >> Looking at this page: >> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/c2html/files/c2html/ >> >> I would say that Sourceforge is calculating the date incorrectly. > > I downloaded the archive labeled 0.9.6-3 (raring) and all the version > references I found inside were for 1.1.0, there are some comment headers in > the source with the date of last change, which was "Date of last change: > 19-December-2004" as the most recent one.
Huh? Are you sure you're in the right folder? I just downloaded both tarballs to compare: c2html from sourceforge: $ grep -c "Date of last change" -r . | grep -v :0 | wc -l 8 c2html from launchpad: $ grep -c "Date of last change" -r . | grep -v :0 | wc -l 0 _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
