On 03.01.2013, at 09:40, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jan 2, 2013, at 19:57, [email protected] wrote: > >> Revision: 100993 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/100993 >> Author: [email protected] >> Date: 2013-01-02 17:57:20 -0800 (Wed, 02 Jan 2013) >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> csu: more specific architecture support, including 64-bit on darwin 9 >> >> Modified Paths: >> -------------- >> trunk/dports/devel/csu/Portfile >> >> Modified: trunk/dports/devel/csu/Portfile >> =================================================================== >> --- trunk/dports/devel/csu/Portfile 2013-01-03 01:46:13 UTC (rev 100992) >> +++ trunk/dports/devel/csu/Portfile 2013-01-03 01:57:20 UTC (rev 100993) >> @@ -21,8 +21,13 @@ >> default_variants +universal >> build.env-append CC='${configure.cc} -Wl,-new_linker' >> >> + >> variant universal { >> - build.env-append RC_ARCHS='${universal_archs}' >> + if {${os.major} == 9} { >> + build.env-append RC_ARCHS='ppc ppc64 i386 x86_64' >> + } else { >> + build.env-append RC_ARCHS='i386 x86_64' >> + } >> } > > This doesn't seem right. Instead, you should be setting universal_archs to > the list of architectures you're going to build for (if it is not possible to > accept the list of architectures the user requested in their macports.conf). > Otherwise the list of architectures shown in "port -v installed csu" will not > agree with the list of architectures for which the port has actually been > compiled. Okay, changed in r104698. Regards, Michael _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
