On Apr 18, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Frank Schima <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone know why the perl5 portgroup does not include 5.16 in the default > branches? Does anyone see a reason not to include that?
because it only sets a default perl5.branches for backward compatibility? The portgroup comment says: # perl5.branches exists here for backward compatibility with old p5 portfiles. # You should still set it in the portfile. each of your ports that use the perl5 portgroup should set perl5.branches itself... -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
