On 2013-6-4 22:18 , Clemens Lang wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 02:13:41AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: >> Revision: 106668 >> https://trac.macports.org/changeset/106668 >> Author: [email protected] >> Date: 2013-06-04 02:13:40 -0700 (Tue, 04 Jun 2013) >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> run destroot/archivefetch instead of install target when doing a forced >> upgrade. >> install is a noop for an already installed port, so effectively we didn't >> have >> the new copy ready to go before uninstalling, meaning the build could still >> fail >> after the old copy was gone. > > Does that mean rev-upgrade will now fetch and/or rebuild to the archive > before deactivating the old port? That's something I wanted to do for > quite a while, because previously rebuilds that failed caused the port > in question to be missing afterwards, which is kind of counter-intuitive > from a user's POV.
I haven't tested rev-upgrade specifically, but I think so, yeah. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
