On 2013-7-23 16:42 , Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > On Jul 22, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Rainer Müller <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Other options of this kind such as prefix, applications_dir, and >> frameworks_dir are handled in archive_sites.conf. >> >> Shouldn't we add this one there instead? > > I'm not sure that this is the same kind of beast. > > The checks in archive_sites.conf / portarchivefetch.tcl are per-site; they > can differ from one archive source to the next, if you specify multiple > archive sources. > > On the other hand, this is a global setting that effectively overrides > buildfromsource, so it's cleaner (and easier) to handle it where > buildfromsource is handled. I tried to implement the check in > portarchivefetch.tcl but found that I'd have to also fix _archive_available > in portutil.tcl, and who knows what else. It seems better to literally > override buildfromsource and leverage all the existing > always-build-from-source logic.
What if you set up an archive source that also uses a non-default setting for delete_la_files? I still think that accommodating changing this at all gives the false impression that anyone should be doing it. - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
