On Aug 15, 2013, at 11:38, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Aug 14, 2013, at 23:58, [email protected] wrote: > >> Revision >> 109415 >> Author >> [email protected] >> Date >> 2013-08-14 23:58:50 -0700 (Wed, 14 Aug 2013) >> Log Message >> >> revbump ports that link with libgd in their default configuration to rebuild >> with gd2 @2.1.0 (libgd.3.dylib) > > Shouldn't we be revbumping ports that link against gd2 in non-default > variants as well? I did not think so, because most users aren't using those variants, our buildbots haven't built packages of them, and any users who are using them will automatically get those ports rebuilt via rev-upgrade. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
