Hi, can somebody with more insight into the binary archives shed light on what will happen if I epoch-bump a number of ports, but neither change version nor revision? Will users end up downloading an old copy of the port from packages.macports.org in that case? It seems to me the epoch isn't encoded in the filename for our binary archives (see libedit[1] as an example).
The background here is that all haskell packages need to be rebuilt whenever GHC is updated. Can I avoid touching each port by adding an epoch line to the Haskell PortGroup? I suppose that might not be enough, because portindex wouldn't reindex the changed ports then, right? What's the best way to overcome this situation? [1] http://packages.macports.org/libedit/ -- Clemens Lang _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
