On 30 Oct 2013, at 23:04, Ned Deily <[email protected]> wrote: > In article <[email protected]>, > Rainer Muller <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well, after thinking about this again, we could also do it the other way >> around. The majority of ports already builds just fine if you have the >> Command Line Tools only, without Xcode (ignore warnings from base about >> missing xcodebuild, it's not actually required in this case). [...] > From the outside looking in, that strikes me as a much more realistic and > potentially achievable goal.
I'd still like to encourage considering both cases: 1. When Xcode is installed, but Command Line Tools aren't 2. When Command Line Tools are installed, but Xcode isn't >From my position, I don't see that the scale of 2 is significantly different >to 1, particularly since in both cases the shims - including xcrun - will be >there to assist locating the relevant tools, headers and libraries. pab _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
