On Nov 11, 2013, at 10:31, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > On Nov 11, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Nov 11, 2013, at 10:14, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >>>>> platform variants get recorded in the registry. >>>> >>>> Is that still true? >>> >>> yes (at least, I have one example of a port with a platform darwin that >>> port installed has listed with +darwin and port variants doesn't list a >>> +darwin variant). >> >> I’m not seeing it on my system, for example with wine-devel. What port do >> you see this with? What exactly does “port -v installed” show for that port? >> Maybe there’s something special/wrong about that port. > > maybe, I see it with 'mutt' but not with wine-devel (and not with any ports > on another machine I just checked), so maybe it doesn't get recorded like > that anymore…
$ sudo port install mutt Password: ---> Computing dependencies for mutt ---> Fetching distfiles for mutt ---> Verifying checksums for mutt ---> Extracting mutt ---> Configuring mutt ---> Building mutt ---> Staging mutt into destroot ---> Installing mutt @1.4.2.3_1+universal ---> Activating mutt @1.4.2.3_1+universal ---> Cleaning mutt $ port -v installed mutt The following ports are currently installed: mutt @1.4.2.3_1+universal (active) platform='darwin 13' archs='i386 x86_64’ $ platform blocks were changed from variants into “if” statements in MacPorts 1.9.0. If you installed mutt before MacPorts 1.9.0 and haven’t rebuilt it since then, then it would still be recorded in the registry with a darwin variant. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
