On Dec 13, 2013, at 18:34, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Ports want to change worksrcdir, for example to build in a subdirectory of
> the distfile. However, ports using the github portgroup and its ability to
> fetch a tarball generated from a github tag, which is what we’re talking
> about here, have zero reason to change the distname, so I think using that
> variable is a good idea.
After “sudo port extract”ing all ports that use the github portgroup, I’m
convinced this change is ok. The few ports that aren’t extracting are failing
for other reasons, like checksum mismatches. Committed the change to use
${workpath}/${distname} in r114702.
The only problem this change (and the previous changes already) caused are that
they match the github.author and github.project case-sensitively. This is good,
but github’s web server seems to transparently handle case mismatches. So we
had a couple ports specifying the case incorrectly, which resulted in extract
failures; I’ve fixed these. (It’s also possible that the developers did a case
rename on their github projects after we added the ports.)
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
