On Jan 7, 2014, at 15:39, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> On Jan 7, 2014, at 12:35, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Jan 7, 2014, at 14:21, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>>> Revision
>>> 115645
>>> Author
>>> [email protected]
>>> Date
>>> 2014-01-07 12:21:11 -0800 (Tue, 07 Jan 2014)
>>> Log Message
>>> 
>>> llvm-3.4: Use release tarballs.
>> 
>> Ooh!
>> Shall we switch the MacPorts clang compiler fallback in base from 3.3 to 3.4 
>> now?
> 
> We can.  I recall there were some regressions that were causing you to use 
> 3.2 over 3.3.  Were all those addressed in 3.4?

There was pure, but the problem wasn't about using clang as a compiler; it’s 
about using llvm libraries, and it’s still using 3.2 because pure-gen had 
problems when pure was using llvm 3.3 libraries. I did not yet test with 3.4 
but intend to.

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to