On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 03:20:55AM +1100, Joshua Root wrote: > This doesn't look right. I would think the purpose of the expr here is > to do constant folding, so if you do > > const FOO 2+2 > > then [FOO] would return 4. But with the added braces it returns "2+2".
You're right. Even though we never actually call proc const with an expression (just with constants), I've reverted the change in r116530. Thanks for paying attention. -- Clemens Lang _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
