IIRC there were supposed to be regular (annual?) portmgr elections to make sure the people on it were ones the community of committers wanted, and to make sure they were people who had enough time to dedicate to the project.
If we've got portmgr members who don't have time, to review committer applications, then it would be nice if they would step down (or be moved to the elder council) so that someone with time could take on additional responsibilities (assuming that there is someone interested in joining portmgr). On Feb 28, 2014, at 6:31 PM, Eric Gallager <[email protected]> wrote: > > +2 for Clemens being part of portmgr. Objectively, he would be a good > choice due to his activity level and amount of contributions to the > project. Biasedly, I would want him to be part of it because he was > the one who encouraged me to apply for commit rights in the first > place... > > On 2/28/14, Bradley Giesbrecht <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 Good choice. >> >> >> Regards, >> Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla) >> >> >> On Feb 28, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Jeremy Lavergne <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> portmgr@ could grow to include another volunteer though :-P >>> >>> Maybe it should include someone as influential as Clemens. >>> >>> On Feb 28, 2014, at 15:42, Clemens Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> IMO, now is as good a time as any. Why delay it if it's finished earlier? >>>> Of course portmgr@ are all volunteers, too. -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
