Too late to decrease the revision for the subports. I would remove the
“revision 1” line at the top that you added, increase the revision from 1 to 2
in the “if {${name} eq ${subport}} { … }” section, and add a “revision 1” line
in the “else” portion of that conditional. This way, any future attempts to set
the revision at the top of the portfile will have no effect. I try to use this
strategy now in portfiles with subports. In one-port portfiles, having a
“revision 0” line is superfluous, but in portfiles with subports, I keep a
revision line in each subport, even if it’s 0, to guard against top-level
revisions being added later.
On Mar 31, 2014, at 04:42, Andrew Stromnov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry. Should I revert revision back to 0 and increase revision in if
> {${name} eq ${subport}} { … } section instead?
> Or just increase revision?
>
> —
> Andrew Stromnov
>
>
> On 31 Mar 2014, at 13:32 , Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 31, 2014, at 03:54, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> Revision
>>> 118334
>>> Author
>>> [email protected]
>>> Date
>>> 2014-03-31 01:54:36 -0700 (Mon, 31 Mar 2014)
>>> Log Message
>>>
>>> bump revision for dependants of leptonica (was updated to 1.70)
>>
>>
>>> --- trunk/dports/textproc/tesseract/Portfile 2014-03-31 00:19:21 UTC
>>> (rev 118333)
>>> +++ trunk/dports/textproc/tesseract/Portfile 2014-03-31 08:54:36 UTC
>>> (rev 118334)
>>>
>>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> name tesseract
>>>
>>> version 3.02.02
>>>
>>> +revision 1
>>>
>>> categories textproc graphics pdf
>>>
>>> platforms darwin
>>
>> tesseract is a port with many subports. Only the main port links with
>> leptonica. Its revision was already one (see further down in the portfile)
>> so you haven’t increased it yet; you’ve only increased the revision of the
>> language subports, which didn’t need it.
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
