(forgot to CC the list) ----- Message Transféré -----
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 16:54:36 +0200 De: Eric Le Lay <[email protected]> À: Joshua Root <[email protected]> Sujet: Re: non standard install location and binary packages Le Sun, 11 May 2014 21:30:30 +1000, Joshua Root <[email protected]> a écrit : > It shouldn't just warn, it should error out if archivefetch does not > succeed in fetching an archive. And that works fine when using -b > with a default prefix, at least. Agreed. It should error out. For me (beta2) it doesn't error out when using -b with non default prefix. > > But we do appear to be assuming in a couple of places that if you are > using binary-only mode then you will have at least one usable entry in > archive_sites; archivefetch_main for example where all_archive_files > will be empty if there are no archive_sites. > > So while this configuration should not be expected to work, we should > error out instead of continuing. r119938 > Looks good! I've added a page in the wiki to describe binary archives. I think a link to it from the error message would be nice, don't you think? http://trac.macports.org/wiki/BinaryArchives#blocks Anybody please feel free to correct/enrich this page. I just tried to gather the little knowledge I have about them... _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
