On Jun 24, 2014, at 5:53 PM, Peter Danecek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 25 Jun 2014, at 00:34, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Jun 24, 2014, at 4:12 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> +post-deactivate { >>> + ui_msg "Purging CRLs ..." >>> + system "${prefix}/sbin/clean-crl -v -l ${certdir}" >>> + >>> + # cleanup leftover directories >>> + catch {file delete ${certdir}} >>> + catch {file delete ${prefix}/etc/grid-security} >>> +} >> >> You can just use "delete X" instead of "catch {file delete X}". > > Okay, but would this change merit a revision bump? I understand that the > post-(de)activate scripts are registered with the installed port, or am I > wrong? They are, but since this change would just be for stylistic reasons and wouldn't change the functionality, I wouldn't increase the revision. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
