On Jul 4, 2014, at 10:05 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > I have new mariadb100 and mariadb101-devel ports installed and with basic > tests (connect to information_schema db). > > I do not know that I am a fan of "drop the dot" version naming but > consistency has it's place. > > Does anyone want to share their opinion as to naming these ports mariadb100 > and mariadb101-devel vs mariadb10.0 and mariadb10.1-devel?
Jeremy H has been of the opinion that we should not drop the dot, and should separate the version from the name with a dash, and has done so with the clang ports (e.g. clang-3.4). This seems to work fine. mariadb-10.0 mariadb-10.1 Don't use a -devel suffix. (clang-3.5 doesn't.) _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
