On Jul 6, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jul 4, 2014, at 10:05 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > >> I have new mariadb100 and mariadb101-devel ports installed and with basic >> tests (connect to information_schema db). >> >> I do not know that I am a fan of "drop the dot" version naming but >> consistency has it's place. >> >> Does anyone want to share their opinion as to naming these ports mariadb100 >> and mariadb101-devel vs mariadb10.0 and mariadb10.1-devel? > > Jeremy H has been of the opinion that we should not drop the dot, and should > separate the version from the name with a dash, and has done so with the > clang ports (e.g. clang-3.4). This seems to work fine. > > mariadb-10.0 > mariadb-10.1 I like it! > Don't use a -devel suffix. (clang-3.5 doesn't.) Is clang-3.5 alpha? Mariadb 10.1 is alpha. My reason for adding -devel is to not encourage the casual user to install alpha software. Would mariadb-devel or mariadb-10.1-alpha be better? Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
