On Jul 25, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Mihai Moldovan <[email protected]> wrote: > > * On 25.07.2014 03:50 pm, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> +1 for this too. I have at least one non-openmaintainer port that went ~9 >> years between upstream releases - I'm not going to remember to check in a >> mostly meaningless timestamp update every 6 months just to keep it >> non-openmaintainer. > > It is busywork. However, I find it very unlikely that a port doesn't get > changed at least once every 6 months. Maybe not for updates, but because > dependencies require a revision bump, a new OS version came out requiring a > quick fix, or just because base evolved.
this is something we could mine our subversion repo to see if it's true or not (or how true it is). -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
