Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> Revision >> 124087
>> rpm5x: replace with 5.4.x > > This is not sufficient to replace a port. For the proper procedure, see > https://trac.macports.org/wiki/PortfileRecipes#replaced-by Well, it would be OK for any users of the old ports to keep using them. Instead of adding these empty pseudoports with a fake pre-configure ? Just wanted to avoid new installations of the legacy versions, but OK. I'll revert the commit, so you can make a real decision about RPM... --anders PS. The example is wrong. xz-devel (4.999) was "upgraded" to xz (5.0) and then xz-devel went onwards to 5.1alpha versions instead... That is the very nature of the -devel ports, since you don't have any "testing" area. But I've removed most of the -devel ports now. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
