On 05/09/2014, at 10:20 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > On Sep 4, 2014, at 8:04 PM, Ian Wadham <iandw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So why not "checkself"? Cheers, Ian W. > > Because it's not "updateself", it's "selfupdate".
Well, I was also going to suggest "updateself"… : -) the logic being that "port" commands usually follow the sequence "port <do-something> <to-something>", but I realise "selfupdate" is deeply entrenched… I suggested "checkself" because someone, IIRC, did not want to have to type as far as the "u" if they required "selfupdate". Cheers, Ian W. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
