Lawrence Velázquez writes: > On Sep 16, 2014, at 1:30 AM, Clemens Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If I were you, I'd set a timeout and if nobody argues that we should keep >> them >> for a good reason, delete them once the timeout has passed. Probably ask >> -users, >> too. > > I like this. > >> While we're at it, isn't 2.6 unsupported as well? > > Yes, and so are 3.1 through 3.3. Frankly, I'd fully support replacing all of > them with python2 @2.7.8 and python3 @3.4.1 (which would also make it easy to > comply with PEP 394*), but that might be a wee bit radical for some. > > My problem with python24 and python25 (aside from having to maintain dead > software) is that they aren't framework installations, making them even more > of a pain to deal with. Note the 2.4/2.5-specific logic in python-1.0, for > example. python26 is pretty similar to python27, at least.
All good points. I guess I'd be ok with removing them as well. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
