Hi, ----- On 14 Oct, 2014, at 16:12, Daniel J. Luke [email protected] wrote:
> We do have versionability in portgroups, it just hasn't been used much so far. Just for the record, this isn't true. The active-variants PortGroup exists in two versions due to an API change. On the issue at hand, my standpoint is that we should support common build systems in base, e.g. at least autoconf and cmake. Ideally, a Portfile for an autoconf tool would in my mind boil down to PortSystem 1.0 # <download metadata, name, version, and license information> build.type gnu Along with that, we should radically speed up and improve our base release process, and improve code quality and API spec in base. -- Clemens Lang _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
