On Nov 10, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know that I understand these variant checks, they seem to not produce > the same result in all cases: > > http://trac.macports.org/browser/tags/release_2_3_2/base/src/port/port.tcl#L289 > http://trac.macports.org/browser/tags/release_2_3_2/base/src/port/port.tcl#L1752 > http://trac.macports.org/browser/tags/release_2_3_2/base/src/macports1.0/macports.tcl#L730 > http://trac.macports.org/browser/tags/release_2_3_2/base/src/port1.0/portutil.tcl#L2289 > > Would a proc for testing variant name sanity be worth the effort? It would probably be a good idea to decide on an authoritative specification and consolidate verification in a single place. vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
