> On Nov 20, 2014, at 7:46 AM, Rainer Müller <[email protected]> wrote: > > On a side note, using something more generic like 'checksum' as field > name with a value of 'md5:abc012...' or 'sha256:def345...' would be more > flexible as a the schema. Either CHAR or VARCHAR are all just TEXT > ignoring the length for SQLite, right?
Yup. http://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html#affinity vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
