On Dec 7, 2014, at 2:07 PM, René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sunday December 07 2014 19:07:14 Marko Käning wrote: > >> On 07 Dec 2014, at 19:01 , René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Would you believe I've started looking at my idea posted earlier, having a >>> port:qt5-kde (with ditto PortGroups)? >> >> COOL! :) >> >> Are you saying that this would be a whole new Qt5 just for KF5? > > For now it's just the same as qt5-mac but installed to a different location. > > But yes, rolling our own version has the advantage that we can do things our > way, introduce any required patches that are more or less KDE specific (and > could "break" things in qt5-mac, such as deactivation of the menurole > guessmatism), and not depend on the qt-mac maintainer. Or rather, > maintainers: I noticed qt4-mac and qt5-mac are not maintained by the same > person, which probably doesn't help the concurrency thing... So your solution to having two QT ports with two different maintainers is to add a third QT port with a third maintainer? vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
