On Dec 11, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2014-12-12 06:51 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >> >> On Dec 10, 2014, at 12:19 AM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Dec 9, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: >>> >>>> Is this behavior by design? >>>> >>>> $ sudo port -q deactivate sqlgrey postfix >>>> ---> Deactivating sqlgrey @1.8.0-rc2_2+mysql+perl5_20 >>>> ---> Deactivating postfix @2.11.3_0 >>>> $ sudo port -q activate sqlgrey postfix >>>> ---> Computing dependencies for sqlgrey >>>> ---> Dependencies to be installed: postfix >>>> ---> Activating postfix @2.11.3_0 >>>> ---> Activating sqlgrey @1.8.0-rc2_2+mysql+perl5_20 >>>> ---> The following versions of postfix are currently installed: >>>> ---> postfix @2.11.2_0 >>>> ---> postfix @2.11.3_0 (active) >>>> ---> postfix @2.11.3_0+dovecot_sasl+mariadb >>>> Error: port activate failed: Registry error: Please specify the full >>>> version as recorded in the port registry. >>> >>> It looks expected, in so far as you have multiple versions of postfix >>> installed, asked MacPorts to activate postfix, and did not specify which >>> one you wanted to activate. >> >> Right, with sqlgrey and multiple postfix versions installed and inactive why >> does port not ask me which postfix version to activate when activating >> sqlgrey? >> >> If "port activate postfix" requires me to specify a version then why >> wouldn't activation via dependency also ask? > > Same reason 'port install sqlgrey' doesn't ask which version of postfix > to activate. > > - Josh Ok, and the reason is? Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
