On 2014-12-23 04:35 , Mihai Moldovan wrote: > On 22.12.2014 06:18 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >> If I see a port [email protected]+bar, I should not have to wonder whether there is >> also a [email protected], or whether the no-variant version is [email protected] or >> whatever. > > My case here is very much more simple. > > Revbumping the whole audacious-plugins port would lead to useless rebuilds for > those not having the ffmpeg variant enabled. Even though one could state that > +ffmpeg is the default if +sdl2 wasn't selected (which it is not, by default) > and a "global" revbump would *maybe* have little overhead (i.e., affects only > a > small number of -ffmpeg installations.)
Does the port in fact show up as outdated for people who have it installed with the rev-bumped variant? - Josh _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
