-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 23.12.2014 01:04 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2014-12-23 04:35 , Mihai Moldovan wrote: >> On 22.12.2014 06:18 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >>> If I see a port [email protected]+bar, I should not have to wonder whether there is >>> also a [email protected], or whether the no-variant version is [email protected] or >>> whatever. >> >> My case here is very much more simple. >> >> Revbumping the whole audacious-plugins port would lead to useless rebuilds >> for >> those not having the ffmpeg variant enabled. Even though one could state that >> +ffmpeg is the default if +sdl2 wasn't selected (which it is not, by default) >> and a "global" revbump would *maybe* have little overhead (i.e., affects >> only a >> small number of -ffmpeg installations.) > > Does the port in fact show up as outdated for people who have it > installed with the rev-bumped variant?
It did for me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUmLPAAAoJEB/WLtluJTqHlicP/iep6TXSGGntqKsNeH6Ms7f5 XIDCoRV87IAsyMUzk9DHCPdJdwH5kECmF2P1DBuxf1C3gHEeRgJIA7x57d9SUMLB 90KWDyQBMzGS64Ty9xKcA4lqWo+2ZcgrfnwB0wyCLnDFgNaDlaTjHr0Z1KuZd7F8 VtzVDtnk9XzH/4qmFkqK2G4330JK67mCv12hhM7+dTQG1fcHFqoE6CwTc5RuhAua q1RScVuS+oQUjThQp0KYX9uUK1FYTPbS3QwY0h+n9oGZwiUcaHz/zcMVeXTBqhX6 VcnlW08G5Y2M+4FbxjfC15s8ZLYPuIUpzrvcWR8oy3WWOBdEdaA0gDW/o9XiR3If ZIakM4Mv32pCXM46Y36w4xgoRCoM6HQTxHzfgfR2AKNFWy0jxHzzfre5VJnKu/jG 1KzjO6MCem0hi5D8Gg9jW/UURYB4jKIXFdIYSBR8X/TS9sohwo5TiqMlykZ8eEq8 DF8Gkwtdw8pQRwEkNJ9iDx6QvXIVlw4Q6kV8sfabRBHSCawX6msbJg98WXvVTO5F VY9aKNKQz+MpRSQ3vgZ8y4m/QSpK0l0Ke19Wo5SnS0uZPHzc2Wh2rlW0hRJgr/3p z/tKWIYebVAcHnp0Yt8oNDN62M1c4TMPyxojb2lF4fGkun9Y5YaKWTc8KErj4BL0 hsvD9lsIHUz86MDT5AlL =OEI2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
