> On Dec 22, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2014-12-23 04:35 , Mihai Moldovan wrote: >> On 22.12.2014 06:18 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >>> If I see a port [email protected]+bar, I should not have to wonder whether there is >>> also a [email protected], or whether the no-variant version is [email protected] or >>> whatever. >> >> My case here is very much more simple. >> >> Revbumping the whole audacious-plugins port would lead to useless rebuilds >> for >> those not having the ffmpeg variant enabled. Even though one could state that >> +ffmpeg is the default if +sdl2 wasn't selected (which it is not, by default) >> and a "global" revbump would *maybe* have little overhead (i.e., affects >> only a >> small number of -ffmpeg installations.) > > Does the port in fact show up as outdated for people who have it > installed with the rev-bumped variant?
for simplicity and consistency, it's probably worth a few 'useless rebuilds' to have this port conform to the existing standard -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
