On Dec 24, 2014, at 5:45 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> 
> I'm wondering about the port, though. I saw that libpgf appears to be part of 
> something called pgf which isn't the same thing already present as port:pgf . 
> I hope there's no unwritten rule that states I should propose a port for the 
> full monty, with libpgf a subport?

I would just worry about the part that you need now. If the other parts are 
needed later we can deal with it then.

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to