Yes, that would correspond to my experience. On 25 Dec 2014, at 15:35, Lawrence Velázquez <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Dec 25, 2014, at 3:58 AM, René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thursday December 25 2014 00:51:33 Mihai Moldovan wrote: >> >>> Actually, it is. Without running portindex first, the port will not be >>> recognized as outdated. >> >> That's not my experience. I've routinely bumped version and revision numbers >> in my local portfiles, without running portindex. > > The "outdated" pseudoport (as in `port upgrade outdated`) will not include > newly-updated ports if the portindex has not been refreshed with `portindex` > or something that calls it, like `port selfupdate` or `port sync`. > > However, updating a port and upgrading it explicitly (e.g., `port upgrade > foo`) works. > > vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
