Hi,

> On 1 Jan 2015, at 10:16 pm, René J.V. Bertin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Thursday January 01 2015 22:38:32 Clemens Lang wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
>> The only configuration system (of relevant size and adoption) that falls 
>> into this
>> category is CMake. We could use ninja instead of make for all CMake ports, 
>> but
> 
> That's what I had in mind.
> 
>> orders of magnitude faster) than make when build times are largely dominated 
>> by
>> the compile times itself, rather than the execution time of the build tool.
> 
> I must admit that I share your scepticism, but I've been seeing too many 
> comments to the contrary lately that I'm getting interested to try things out.

Ninja is possibly of interest to developers, who repeatedly (re)build packages 
during development, as ninja is a bit quicker at figuring out what needs 
rebuilding etc. For a single from scratch build there will be essentially no 
benefit, so do not expect replacing make with ninja to help much with a normal 
port build. 

> As you said, this would be in conjunction with CMake, which also happens to 
> generate Makefiles that are very verbose. That adds considerable overhead 
> (esp. with the long path names courtesy of MacPorts' build directory), which 
> could well exceed the time required for the actual destroot step.
> 
>>> How would one set things up for this?
>> 
>> Modify the CMake PortGroup to use ninja.
> 
> Basically by adding  "-G ninja" to the configure.args, and then modify the 
> variables defining the make application and arguments? I'd do that first in a 
> test port rather than imposing it on every port depending on CMake.

I suspect that would be a bad idea, given most packages will not be tested 
against ninja. If done at all, it should be done on a port by port basis once 
that port has been properly tested. However, QI still very much doubt there is 
much to be gained for 'normal' port builds.

Chris

> 
> R.
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to