On Jan 5, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Mihai Moldovan <[email protected]> wrote: > But, but, but! That sounds like work! And people™ are still using those > ports! (Seriously, we should consider if that is REALLY a valid reason > or just go with what mojca said. I'd be for removing the ports, but I'm > not exactly authoritative.)
Some combination of if there is an active maintainer and there is still upstream support should probably factor into the decision too. If there is not an active maintainer, and upstream isn't supporting a port, we should probably remove it (it can always be added back if someone steps up to maintain it). -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
