On Tuesday January 06 2015 11:48:46 Michael Dickens wrote: > There just isn't enough time in the day! Some day, I won't be so crazy > busy! Some day, I really will address the Qt4 tickets. I really do like > the idea of having Qt4 and Qt5 available at the same time & I know that > Qt4 needs some attention (as does Qt5, but I haven't even found time for
Do you use port:qt4-mac yourself? If so, it won't necessarily take a lot of time to install it in concurrent mode, esp. if you've kept your work/build tree around. Given the lack of feedback, I was actually planning to make +concurrent the default (= remove the variant), and add a +exclusive variant corresponding to the current default behaviour. That might make testing even easier... > the Qt4 stuff yet). Both ports are listed as 'openmaintainer' if anybody > else -really- wants to go there :) - MLD Hmm, yeah, I can understand why few people feel like taking up an official maintainer status for that kind of port ... R. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
