> On Feb 7, 2015, at 05:57, Jean-Baptiste Kempf <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In defense of Jeremy, I think he was. I took over the Portfile that had his >> signature, so I'm presuming that's what he used too. >> And it does a bootstrap before invoking configure. > > He claimed that sedding our buildsystem was correct.
Can you point out where you're referring to? >>> Not to mention heavily patching VLC, with no good reason, as we can see >>> with the NSEnviron ticket. How is that "heavily" patching VLC? Also, as you can see by my comment in that ticket, the change I am suggesting makes your app conform to environ(3). Right now, you're relying on undocumented behavior which could change. >> Again in his defense, I hold him in high esteem as a developer, who knows OS >> X way more intimately than most (he's the main XQuartz developer). > > So what? He could be the kernel core developer or Linux Torvalds, that > wouldn't > change a thing. He behaved wrongly, and then complained we were > insulting him, and lied about his patches not being taken in accounts. Really? Where have I lied? >> I've seen the patches, I've even extended one (to get rid of the last >> references to Growl). We may not agree on how good the reasons are for those >> patches (= the ones I know of), but from what I can see they have nothing to >> do with the issue at hand. > > One of them is amazing, by patching a clear and on-purpose limitation of > linking to libavcodec 56... Where are you referring to?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
